This Co-Learning Encounter is primarily designed for those who wish to participate and learn about critical digital pedagogies and the history of art and architecture. By the end of this two-week encounter, the community participants should feel prepared to begin teaching, with a workable syllabus and online interaction design in-hand.
Critical Digital Pedagogy and the History of Art and Architecture
A Co-Learning Encounter designed by Kate Joranson and Alison Langmead
Proposed Schedule of Topics
Unit 1 | Unit 2 | Unit 3 | Unit 4 | Unit 5 |
Introduction, Community Creation, and Intentions | Critical Digital Pedagogy | Object-Based Learning, Online | Active Learning/ Class Discussion | Mid-CLE Retrospectives and Forward-Planning |
Unit 6 | Unit 7 | Unit 8 | Unit 9 | Unit 10 |
Accessibility | Conveying Information | Assignments / (un)grading | Liberatory Pedagogy in a Time of Crisis | Retrospectives and Forward-Planning |
Time Commitment Requested
Asynchronous Engagement
About 30 hours total |
Synchronous Engagement
About 30 hours total |
Foundational Learning Foci
- A critical digital pedagogy is about connection and the creation of community even when our ability to see, read and listen to one another is always mediated by technology.
- The process of moving from a face-to-face learning environment into a remote learning environment is difficult, heavy with intentionality, and potentially liberatory.
- The work of learning about the affordances of the remote learning environment is also the work of learning about the assumed and perhaps never-before-clearly-seen affordances of the face-to-face learning environment.
- This transition also makes possible a study and recognition of the inequitable distribution of educational resources, whether face-to-face or socially distanced.
Asynchronous Efforts
1. Preparing Your Syllabus
We ask for the first component of your asynchronous work during this CLE to be that you arrive with in a syllabus (new, old, of any type) that you want to re-design in order to teach it anew in the remote learning environment. Keep coming back to it and working on it as we move ahead. With engagement and persistence, you will find it transformed.
2. Summative Document
- Over the course of this Co-Learning Encounter (CLE), we would like to encourage you to make particular conscious effort to note your questions and reflections on this experience, and take the time to write them out each day.
- We would like to encourage you to produce a summative document at the end of this CLE designed to share out what you have learned, opinions you have garnered, resources you find helpful, or any other such information that might be useful to our wider community.
- Overall Questions to Prompt Reflection:
- What do/did you want to learn?
- What are you learning?
- What did you find surprising?
- What are you curious about?
- What are you never going to do that you learned today?
- What seems possible, and what seems impossible?
- In what ways did the experience of this CLE allow you to see what your students might experience in your online classroom?
Synchronous Efforts
In this design, there are 10 synchronous sessions, each held in two, 45-minute engagement periods
Unit 1: Introduction and Generous Thinking
Content Offerings
- Shannon Henry Kleiber, “Interview with Anne Basting: MacArthur Fellow Anne Basting On Asking People With Dementia ‘Beautiful Questions,” To the Best of Our Knowledge, August 17, 2019.
- We ask that you click the “Listen Now” button under the header image to hear the 17-minute streaming audio recording, but you should also feel free to peruse the text and videos on this page!
- Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Generous Thinking, Chapter 1, 46-81 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2019).
- Charles Hodges, Stephanie Moore, Barb Lockee, and Torrey Trust, “The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning,” Educause Review, March 27, 2020.
Intentional Preparation
- Make an honest assessment of your dreams for, and your attachment to, the syllabus you have brought to this CLE, and how you might like to work through it during this Co-Learning Encounter (CLE). That is, reflect on the course you are bringing to the table–your personal connection to its content, how you view your own teaching style at this time, what your teaching goals are (both onsite and online), your thoughts on what you’d like the students to learn, etc…
First Engagement
- The co-learning, co-hosts will provide their own context for participating in the co-learning environment, followed by invitations to contribute from the whole community.
- You are invited to consider questions such as:
- What questions are you going to be chewing on for the next two weeks?
- What are you wrestling with currently?
- What syllabus did you bring and why?
- What are you feeling strong about in terms of your online pedagogical approach?
Second Engagement
- Discussion about our preferred shared group practices, think through the topics that have been set out for this two-week CLE, contribute ideas about its organization, and consider what it means to practice generously in academia.
Unit 2: Critical Digital Pedagogy
Content Offerings
- Jesse Stommel, “Critical Digital Pedagogy: A Definition,” Hybrid Pedagogy, November 17, 2014.
- Audrey Watters, “The Dial-a-Drill: Automating the Teacher with Ed-Tech at Home,” Hack Education, April 16, 2020.
- Maha Bali and Bard Meier, “An Affinity for Asynchronous Learning,” Hybrid Pedagogy, March 4, 2014.
- Other content as contributed by the co-learners
Intentional Preparation
- Reflect directly on the current state of your syllabus and think about where it is now and where you might like it to be. Think through its relationship to your vision of the course itself, but also to the logistical details it represents. We will be presenting brief, “current snapshots” of our syllabi in the second engagement this week.
First Engagement
- Discussion of Stommel’s definition of Critical Digital Pedagogy and the affordances of synchronous and asynchronous learning. How are we thinking we would like to structure the actual logistics of our classes?
Second Engagement
- We will continue setting up workshop norms, in practice, through the process of presenting the current state of our syllabi: where they are and where we would like them to go.
- We will be deciding together if this is best done in breakout groups or as a community of the whole. This arrangement can also change as we see fit.
Unit 3: Object-Based Learning
Content Offerings
- Shari Tishman, Slow Looking: The Art and Practice of Learning through Observation, Chapters 1 and 2, pp. 1-27 (New York: Routledge, 2017).
- Jennifer L. Roberts, “The Power of Patience,” Harvard Magazine (Nov-Dec, 2013).
- Other content as contributed by the co-learners
Intentional Preparation
- Think over how you would have used objects in your on-site classroom for the course you are working on in this CLE. What would you have liked for your students to have learned from these object-focused activities? How much of those learning outcomes are truly predicated on your students co-viewing particular works of art, and how many of them could be achieved using household or neighborhood objects? How many of them could be achieved by using digital surrogates?
First Engagement
- How could we engage slow looking, material analysis, consideration of facture, and/or site analysis in an online/distance education environment?
Second Engagement
- We will work together to apply the concepts (and realizations) from the first engagement to our course methods and materials. How might we apply our knowledge of object-based learning to an environment that sometimes undermines—but sometimes supports—its goals?
Unit 4: Active Learning/Class Discussion
Content Offerings
- Chris Friend, “Learning to Let Go: Listening to Students in Discussion,” Hybrid Pedagogy, September 10, 2014.
- Ben van Overmeire, “Opening the Classroom: Ownership and Engagement,” Hybrid Pedagogy, March 20, 2018.
- The Ohio State University, Office of Distance Education and eLearning Resource Center, “Active Learning in an Online Course,” January 2017.
- Sean Michael Morris and Jesse Stommel, “The Discussion Form Is Dead; Long Live the Discussion Forum,” An Urgency of Teachers (Press Books Online Publishing, 2018).
- Sarah Rose Cavanaugh, “How to Make Your Teaching More Engaging: Advice Guide,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, n.d.
- Other content as contributed by the co-learners
Intentional Preparation
- Reflect on 1 or 2 meaningful class discussions that you have either led or to which you have contributed, in your capacity as an instructor, student discussion leader, or student participant. What made them meaningful?
First Engagement
- Discussion of intentional preparation prompt, and how to bring these qualities/techniques/outcomes into an online environment.
- What is active learning and what’s it all about, for real?
Second Engagement
- We will work together to apply the concepts (and realizations) from the first engagement to our course methods and materials. How might we produce an active, engaged class experience through online/distance education?
Unit 5: Mid-CLE Retrospectives and Springboards
Content Offerings
- None from us. Please focus on preparing your syllabus and course outlook in order to participate in the Mid-CLE Retrospective conversations!
Intentional Preparation
- Return to the questions you offered on Day 1. Where does this question stand now? How have your questions shifted? Do you have new questions? Where would you like to go over the next week (and beyond)?
First Engagement
- So that each co-learner may have 15 minutes of our attention, we will be breaking out into groups to present our mid-CLE reflections to one another, ask for advice, and get feedback.
- When your breakout group comes to any sort of consensus on a topic, comes up with any communal questions, or in any other way has something that they’d like to bring to the whole community, please do make a note!
Second Engagement
- Group discussion of the findings, questions, and feedback shared in the breakout groups of the first engagement, along with an overall summative conversation.
Unit 6: Accessibility
Content Offerings
- Canvas LMS, Accessibility within Canvas Help Guides
- Southern Poverty Law Center, “Supporting Students Through Coronavirus,” Teaching Tolerance, n.d.
- Take a look at the collection of articles here designed to help teachers support students with learning disabilities, those experiencing corona-virus racism, and more. This collection of resources is designed for social-justice oriented K-12 educators, and there are many many ideas that apply to university level teaching.
- Aimi Hamraie, “Accessible Teaching in the Time of Covid-19,” Mapping Access, March 10, 2020.
- Stephanie Rosen, “FemTechNet Accessibility Report,” FemTechNet, n.d.
- Other content as contributed by the co-learners
Intentional Preparation
- Consider what you, personally, find challenging about learning in online environments.
First Engagement
- Discussion of content and intentional preparation prompts, as well as accessibility resources within Canvas.
Second Engagement
- We will work together to apply the concepts from the first engagement to course methods and materials. Let’s consider how we might adapt as well as design course activities with the lens of accessibility and inclusivity.
Unit 7: Conveying Information
Content Offerings
- Halden Ingwersen, “The Top 5 TED Talks for Online Education Professionals,” Capterra, November 16, 2016.
- Flower Darby, “How to be a Better Online Teacher: Advice Guide,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, n.d.
- Other content as contributed by the co-learners
Intentional Preparation
- Consider your experience as a teacher and a learner, and how those roles have intersected over your lifetime. When you are conveying information in either role, what modes are most comfortable for you, and what modes are challenging? How has this shifted over your lifetime?
First Engagement
- Discussion of content and intentional preparation prompts.
Second Engagement
- We will work together to apply the concepts from the first engagement to course methods and materials.
Unit 8: Assignments and (un)Grading
Content Offerings
- Amy Hasinoff, “Do You Trust Your Students?” Hybrid Pedagogy, August 22, 2018.
- Shea Swauger, “Our Bodies Encoded: Algorithmic Test Proctoring in Higher Education,” Hybrid Pedagogy, April 2, 2020.
- Jesse Stommel, “How to Ungrade,” JesseStommel.com, March 11, 2018.
- Asao B. Inoue, “Appendix A: English 160W’s Grading Contract,” in Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies, 331-336 (Fort Collins: The WAC Clearinghouse, 2015).
- Other content as contributed by the co-learners
Intentional Preparation
- Reflect on your own experience being graded and assigning grades, and consider your relationship to being evaluated and evaluating others. How are your values challenged and/or reinforced as you consider methods of un-grading?
First Engagement
- Discussion of content and intentional preparation prompts.
Second Engagement
- We will work together to apply the concepts from the first engagement to course methods and materials.
Unit 9: Liberatory Pedagogy in a Time of Crisis
Content Offerings
- Aisha S. Ahmad, “Why You Should Ignore All That Coronavirus-Inspired Productivity Pressure,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 27, 2020.
- Shannon Henry Kleiber, “Interview with Priya Parker: When We Gather, We Need Rituals,” To the Best of Our Knowledge, June 22, 2019.
- We ask that you click the “Listen Now” button under the header image to hear the 14-minute streaming audio recording, but you should also feel free to peruse the text and videos on this page!
- Becki Supiano, “Trauma Can Interfere With Students’ Learning: Here’s Something Professors Can Do to Help,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 24, 2018.
- Ricia Anne Chansky, “Teaching Hurricane María: Disaster Pedagogy and the Ugly Auto/Biography,” Pedagogy 19, no. 1 (January 2019): 1-23.
- Other content as contributed by the co-learners
Intentional Preparation
- We are revisiting some of the critical pedagogy concepts we discussed in the first two days of our Co-Learning Encounter. How have these past 2 months affected your own sense of identity? How would you describe your relationship to productivity and compassion?
First Engagement
- We will break into pairs and talk about our plans for “Day One.”
Second Engagement
- We will meet as a large group and discuss the Intentional Preparation prompt (as noted on the course plan) and also think ahead to the summation of the course. We will be asking you to post the beginnings of your summative ideas on a Canvas discussion board before synchronous CLE time on Friday.
Unit 10: Retrospectives and Springboard
Content Offerings
- None from us. Prepare your remarks on the summative document you’d like to produce for our larger community. We hope that the “Intentional Preparation” prompts offered throughout this CLE have helped you to better identify what you have learned, what new opinions you have garnered, what resources you have found (and will continue to find) helpful, or any other information that you’d like to share out.
Intentional Preparation
- Go back to the questions you offered on Day 1, and your reflections from Day 5. Where do your questions stand now? Do you have new questions? Read also through your reflections and do some metacognitive work: What have you learned about how you think, what you value, and what you fear about online/hybrid teaching, and teaching in general? Where do you plan to go from here?
First Engagement
- Synchronous conversation for all who wish to join! We are also happy to facilitate any breakout groups you all might wish to have.
- However, if you would like to spend this time reading, reflecting, and responding to the summative posts on the discussion board, we welcome that as well! As we build up a community record of this experience, focusing our attention on the discussion boards at this moment will reap benefits for us all.
Second Engagement
- Synchronous conversation for all who wish to join! We are also happy to facilitate any breakout groups you all might wish to have.
- However, if you would like to spend this time reading, reflecting, and responding to the summative posts on the discussion board, we welcome that as well! As we build up a community record of this experience, focusing our attention on the discussion boards at this moment will reap benefits for us all.